Describing Graphs, Charts, Diagrams and Tables – All Board Questions-2025 with Answers

All Board Questions-2025

1.Dhaka Board-2025

The graph shows the percentage of different types of books preserved in a college library. Analyze the graph in about 150 words. 15 

2.Rajshahi Board 2025

The graph shows "the smartphone users" from 2017 to 2023. Describe the graph in at least 150 words highlighting the information given in the graph. 15 

3.Sylhet Board -2025

The graph below shows ‘The number of people living below the poverty line from 1995 to 2010.” Describe the graph highlighting the information given in the graph. 15 

4.Dinajpur Board 2025

The pie chart below shows the interests of the students of a college in different subjects. Describe the chart highlighting the information given. 15

Subjects of Interest

English: 15%

Biology: 20%

Bangla: 30%

Physics: 20%

Mathematics: 15%

5.Mymensing Board

The graph below shows the number of people living below the poverty line from 2005-2020. Describe the graph in about 150 words. 15 

6.Cumilla Board

The pie chart below shows the percentages of transportation used by 1000 students to come to X College. Now, describe the chart in 150 words. 15

7.Jasharoe Board-2025

The graph below shows an increase in the number of overseas students at the universities which usually takes place over a period of time. Describe the graph in 150 words.

8.Barishal Board 2025

The pie chart below shows the time allocation of a student’s daily activities. Describe the chart in 150 words. You should highlight and summarize the information in the chart. (15 Marks)

All Board Questions-2025- Answers

1.Dhaka Board-2025: Percentage of Different Types of Books in a College Library

The provided bar graph illustrates the distribution of various categories of books preserved in a college library, measured in percentages. The data displays six distinct categories: Literature, Science, History and Philosophy, Business, Sports, and Others. Overall, the library prioritizes core academic and professional subjects, with Science and Literature together accounting for more than half of the total collection.

According to the graph, Science books constitute the largest portion of the library’s collection at 30%. Literature follows closely as the second most preserved category, accounting for 25% of the total. Business books represent a significant 20% of the collection, while History and Philosophy books make up 15%.

In contrast, the categories of Sports and "Others" represent the smallest segments of the library, each standing at only 5%. The difference between the highest category, Science, and the lowest categories, Sports and Others, is a substantial 25%.

In summary, the library maintains a strong institutional focus on academic disciplines. By dedicating 75% of its space to Science, Literature, and Business, the library clearly highlights its primary role in supporting professional and scientific education.

2.Rajshahi Board-2025: Smartphone Users from 2017 to 2023

This bar graph depicts the growth in the number of smartphone users over a seven-year period, from 2017 to 2023, with figures measured in crores. The data reveals a consistent and significant upward trend in smartphone adoption. Overall, the visual evidence clearly shows how mobile technology has become increasingly integrated into society, with the user base expanding massively over the years.

In 2017, the number of smartphone users started at 1.5 crore, a figure that doubled to 3.0 crore by 2018. This was followed by a steady increase to 3.5 crore in 2019 and 4.5 crore in 2020. The most rapid growth occurred between 2019 and 2021, where users jumped from 3.5 crore to 5.5 crore, indicating a surge in demand.

The upward trajectory continued into the final years, with the user base reaching 6.0 crore in 2022 and peaking at 6.5 crore in 2023. Comparing the start and end points, the number of users grew by 5.0 crore over the six-year interval. This total increase represents a growth of more than four times the original 2017 figure.

In summary, the graph reflects an explosive expansion in the smartphone market. The data suggests that within just seven years, smartphone usage transitioned from a growing trend to a dominant social necessity for 6.5 crore people.

3.Sylhet Board-2025: People Living Below the Poverty Line (1995-2010)

The bar graph presents the percentage of people living below the poverty line across four specific years: 1995, 2000, 2005, and 2010. The data illustrates the fluctuations in poverty levels over a fifteen-year timeframe. Overall, the graph shows an inconsistent pattern, as poverty levels did not follow a steady decline but rather fluctuated significantly between a minimum of 30% and a maximum of 45%.

In 1995, the percentage of people living below the poverty line was 35%. This figure saw a significant rise over the next five years, peaking at 45% in the year 2000. This 10% increase marks the highest poverty level recorded in the graph, highlighting a period of extreme economic hardship for the population.

However, the trend reversed by 2005, when the percentage dropped sharply to its lowest point of 30%. By 2010, the poverty rate rose again to reach 40%. When comparing the initial year to the final year, there was a net increase of 5% in the population living below the poverty line.

In summary, the analysis highlights distinct periods of both increase and decrease in economic struggle. The fact that the period ended with a higher poverty rate than it began suggests that the economic challenges remained a persistent issue for the nation.

4.Dinajpur Board-2025: Student Interests in Different Subjects

The provided pie chart illustrates the academic interests of college students across five specific subjects, breaking them down into percentages. The chart identifies the distribution of preference among Bengali, Biology, English, Physics, and Mathematics . Overall, the data indicates that students show a much stronger affinity for languages and life sciences compared to physical and mathematical sciences, with Bengali and Biology accounting for exactly half of the total interests .

According to the chart, Bengali is the most popular subject among students, with a significant 30.0% expressing their interest in it. Biology holds the second position as a major area of interest, accounting for 20.0% of the total. Together, these two subjects represent 50% of the students' academic preferences, suggesting a prioritized focus on linguistic and biological studies .

In contrast, other subjects receive comparatively lower or varying levels of interest from the student body. Physics is preferred by 20.0% of the students, while Mathematics and English are both recorded at 15.0% . This creates a notable 15% gap between the most preferred subject, Bengali, and the least preferred subjects, Mathematics and English.

In summary, the chart depicts a clear hierarchy in subject popularity where Bengali emerges as the primary academic preoccupation . While students maintain a combined 35% interest in Physics and Mathematics, the overwhelming majority—totaling 65.0%—prefer Bengali, Biology, and English . This distribution suggests that students are more inclined toward humanities and natural sciences than technical mathematical fields .

5.Mymensingh Board-2025: People Living Below the Poverty Line (2005-2020)

The bar graph illustrates the percentage of people living below the poverty line for two distinct groups over a fifteen-year period at five-year intervals. Overall, while both groups experienced a significant spike in 2010, they both ended the period with lower poverty rates than they had in 2005, indicating a long-term improvement in economic conditions.

In 2005, 35% of Group 1 lived below the poverty line, while Group 2 stood at 21%. By 2010, both groups saw a sharp increase; Group 1 peaked at 45% and Group 2 rose to 30%. This year represents the highest poverty level for both categories, suggesting a shared period of economic decline.

However, a downward trend began in 2015, with Group 1 dropping to 32% and Group 2 to 25%. By 2020, poverty levels reached their lowest points for Group 1 at 28% and Group 2 at 20%. Throughout the entire period, Group 1 consistently maintained a higher percentage of poverty than Group 2.

In summary, the data reflects a successful reduction in poverty over the long term despite a major setback in 2010. Both groups finished the fifteen-year cycle with better economic standing, with Group 2 showing the most favorable results at only 20% poverty.

6.Cumilla Board-2025: Student Transportation Methods

This pie chart provides a detailed breakdown of the transportation methods used by 1,000 students to reach X College. The data categorizes students into five primary modes of travel: Bicycle, Bus, Walking, Motorbike, and Car. Overall, the chart reflects a strong preference for economical and active commuting options, with 70% of students using either a bicycle or the bus.

The most dominant form of transport is the bicycle, utilized by a significant 45% of the students. The second most popular method is the bus, which accounts for 25% of the student body. These figures suggest that the majority of students rely on cost-effective means to reach their educational institution.

Regarding the remaining categories, 15% of students choose to walk to college, while 10% use motorbikes. The least common method of transportation is the car, which is used by only 5% of the students. There is a massive 40% difference between the most used method, the bicycle, and the least used method, the car.

In summary, the commuting habits of the students are diverse but heavily skewed toward low-cost transport. With only 15% of students using motorized personal vehicles, the data highlights the prevalence of eco-friendly and public transportation within the student community.

7.Jashore Board-2025: Number of Overseas Students Over Time

The line graph depicts the fluctuations and growth in the number of overseas students at universities from the year 2000 to 2020. Overall, the visual representation illustrates a generally positive trend in international student enrollment over two decades. The data reveals that the university's international appeal grew by more than four times its original size during this period.

In the year 2000, the number of overseas students started at approximately 250. Following a slight initial dip, the numbers began a steady climb, reaching 300 by 2005. The most significant growth occurred between 2005 and 2015, where the count rose sharply to 800 in 2010, and surpassed the 1,000 mark by 2015.

The enrollment peaked around 2018 at nearly 1,200 students before showing a minor decline to approximately 1,150 by 2020. Despite this small final decrease, the overall growth is substantial. Comparing the start and end points, the number of international students increased by roughly 900 over the twenty-year interval.

In summary, the graph proves a successful expansion of the international student base. Despite minor fluctuations at the beginning and end of the period, the transition from 250 to over 1,100 students signifies a major increase in the institution's global popularity.

8.Barishal Board-2025: Daily Activity Distribution of a Student

The pie chart illustrates how a student allocates time across various daily activities, divided into six categories. Overall, the data shows that the student prioritizes rest and education, with these two areas consuming the vast majority of the 24-hour cycle. Academic pursuits and sleep combined account for 75% of the student's daily routine.

Sleep is the most time-consuming activity, taking up 30.0% of the student's day. Academic pursuits are the next priority, with 25.0% of the time spent at College and 20.0% dedicated to independent Study. This high allocation for education reflects a disciplined approach to academic responsibilities.

The remaining 25% of the day is distributed among non-academic categories. Recreation accounts for 12.0%, while 8.0% is categorized as "Other". The least amount of time is dedicated to Play, which sits at just 5.0%. This indicates that leisure and physical activities are secondary to the student's core duties.

In summary, the student's life is heavily structured around school and rest. With only 17% of the day spent on recreation and play, the chart depicts a lifestyle where personal well-being and academic success are given significant importance over miscellaneous tasks.