The number of people living below the poverty line -Graph, Chart, Map, Diagram and Table Interpretation for HSC & SSC / The graph shows number of people living below the poverty line from 1995 to 2010

Sylhet Board -2025

The graph below shows ‘The number of people living below the poverty line from 1995 to 2010.” Describe the graph highlighting the information given in the graph. 15 

Sample Answer 1

The bar chart illustrates the proportion of the population living in poverty at five-year intervals between the years 1995 and 2010.

Overall, the percentage of impoverished individuals experienced significant fluctuations over the 15-year period. It is immediately apparent that the poverty rate did not follow a consistent trend, peaking at the turn of the millennium and reaching its lowest point exactly five years later.

In 1995, slightly more than one-third of the population, exactly 35%, was classified as living below the poverty line. Over the next five years, this figure witnessed a substantial increase. By the year 2000, the poverty rate had surged by an additional 10%, reaching a high of 45%, representing nearly half of the total population.

Following this peak, there was a dramatic improvement in the poverty metrics over the subsequent half-decade. In 2005, the proportion of people experiencing poverty plummeted to 30%, marking the lowest recorded level on the chart. However, this positive economic trend was short-lived, as the final year, 2010, saw the poverty rate climb sharply once again to finish at a formidable 40%.

Sample Answer 2

The provided column graph details the percentage of citizens enduring conditions below the poverty threshold over a 15-year timeframe, specifically highlighting the years 1995, 2000, 2005, and 2010.

Looking from a broader perspective, it is evident that the poverty rate was highly volatile. Rather than demonstrating a steady decline or increase, the data reveals a zigzag pattern across the decades, with the most severe poverty levels documented in the year 2000.

The most striking feature of the graph is the sharp peak observed at the turn of the century, where the proportion of impoverished individuals hit a maximum of 45%. This was a noticeable escalation from the initial baseline figure of 35% recorded five years prior in 1995. Another high point occurred at the very end of the surveyed period in 2010, when the poverty rate escalated back up to 40%, nearly reaching its previous high.

In stark contrast to these elevated figures, the middle of the decade presented the most favorable economic conditions. By 2005, the percentage of the population living in poverty had contracted significantly to a low of 30%. This represented a substantial 15% drop from the 2000 peak, highlighting a period of temporary but significant economic relief before the subsequent rise.

Sample Answer 3

The bar chart provides a comparative analysis of poverty rates, expressed as percentages, measured across four specific years spanning from 1995 to 2010.

Overall, it is abundantly clear that the proportion of the population facing economic hardship did not follow a linear progression. Instead, the data exhibits marked instability, characterized by a pattern of sharp increases followed by a significant decrease, before ultimately rising again.

The demographic share of people living below the poverty line began at 35% in 1995. This initial figure was followed by a sharp deterioration in economic well-being, pushing the poverty rate to its zenith of 45% by the year 2000. A remarkably similar upward trajectory manifested in the latter part of the period; after a temporary decline, the poverty level climbed back up by an additional 10% between 2005 and 2010, finishing the period at an elevated 40%.

The only period of economic improvement captured by the data occurred between 2000 and 2005. During this specific five-year window, the poverty rate dropped considerably. It fell from its peak down to a minimum of 30%, which equates to a one-third reduction in the proportion of impoverished citizens before the negative trend reversed once more.