18. SPORTS
1. Topic: Some people believe that professional sportsmen and women are paid too much money. Do you agree or disagree? Give reasons and relevant examples to support your opinion.
Essay:
There has been a lot of debate about the amount of money that professional sportsmen and women are paid. Some people believe that they earn far too much money, while others argue that their high salaries are justified. In my opinion, I believe that professional athletes are paid too much money and there are several reasons for this.
Firstly, the amount of money that professional athletes earn is disproportionate to the value they bring to society. Although sports provide entertainment and bring people together, they do not contribute to the betterment of society in the same way that doctors, teachers, or engineers do. These professionals are often paid far less than athletes, despite the fact that their work is essential to the functioning of society. Therefore, it is unfair that athletes receive such high salaries for doing something that is not as necessary as other professions.
Secondly, the vast sums of money paid to professional athletes are often at the expense of smaller sports programs and amateur athletes. Many sports programs in schools and universities struggle to find funding and resources, despite the fact that they contribute to the development of young people and the wider community. This is because the majority of sports funding is directed towards professional leagues and athletes. As a result, many talented athletes do not have the opportunity to develop their skills and achieve their full potential.
Finally, the excessive salaries of professional athletes can have a negative impact on society by promoting materialism and consumerism. When young people see their sporting heroes earning millions of dollars, they may begin to believe that success and happiness are only attainable through wealth and fame. This can lead to a culture of greed and selfishness, rather than one of community and cooperation.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that professional sportsmen and women are paid too much money. Their high salaries are disproportionate to the value they bring to society, and the money they receive often comes at the expense of smaller sports programs and amateur athletes. Furthermore, the excessive salaries of professional athletes can have a negative impact on society by promoting materialism and consumerism. It is time to reevaluate our priorities and ensure that we are supporting the people and programs that truly matter.
2. Essay Question: Some people think that sports should be a compulsory part of the school curriculum, while others believe that it should be optional. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Sample Answer:
Sports have been an integral part of human civilization for centuries, and many people believe that they should be an essential part of the school curriculum. While some people argue that sports should be compulsory for all students, others believe that it should be an optional activity. In this essay, we will discuss both sides of the argument and present our own opinion on the matter.
On the one hand, advocates of compulsory sports argue that physical education is just as important as academic education, and should be a mandatory part of the curriculum. They argue that playing sports helps develop a range of skills such as teamwork, discipline, leadership, and time management, all of which are important for success in life. In addition, sports can promote a healthy lifestyle and help combat obesity, which is becoming a major public health issue in many countries.
On the other hand, opponents of compulsory sports argue that not all students are interested in sports, and that it is unfair to force them to participate in something they don't enjoy. They believe that students should have the freedom to choose their own extracurricular activities based on their interests and talents, and that compulsory sports could be detrimental to the physical and mental well-being of some students.
In our opinion, while it is important to encourage physical activity among students, sports should not be compulsory. Instead, schools should provide a variety of extracurricular activities that cater to a range of interests and abilities. This could include activities such as music, art, drama, and community service, in addition to sports. Students should be encouraged to participate in activities that they enjoy and are passionate about, as this can help foster a sense of purpose and belonging, and promote overall well-being.
In conclusion, while there are valid arguments on both sides of the debate, we believe that sports should not be a compulsory part of the school curriculum. Instead, schools should provide a range of extracurricular activities that cater to a range of interests and abilities, and encourage students to pursue activities that they enjoy and are passionate about.
3. Question: Some people argue that sports have become too commercialized. Do you agree or disagree?
Answer: There is no denying that sports have become increasingly commercialized over the years, with the rise of big money sponsorships, lucrative television deals, and the ever-growing influence of sports brands. While some argue that this trend is inevitable and ultimately beneficial to athletes and the industry as a whole, others worry that it has gone too far and that the pursuit of profit has overshadowed the true spirit of sports.
Personally, I tend to agree with the latter view. While I understand that money is an important part of the sports business, I believe that the excessive focus on commercialization has had several negative consequences. For one thing, it has led to a widening gap between the elite, professional athletes who reap the rewards of sponsorship deals and those who play purely for the love of the game. This has also led to a homogenization of sports, where teams and players are increasingly indistinguishable due to the branding that they carry.
Furthermore, the commercialization of sports has led to the prioritization of certain events over others, with only the most high-profile games and tournaments receiving significant coverage and attention. This has diminished the value of smaller, grassroots events and has also contributed to the erosion of local and regional identities in sports.
In conclusion, while I understand the commercial realities of the sports industry, I believe that there needs to be a better balance between profit and the true spirit of sports. This will require a concerted effort from all stakeholders, including athletes, sponsors, and fans, to ensure that the values and traditions of sports are not lost in the pursuit of profit.
4. Question: Some people think that sports stars earn too much money. What is your opinion?
Answer: In my view, it is true that some sports stars earn exorbitant amounts of money. While I understand that their fame and skills are in high demand, it seems unfair that they should receive such astronomical salaries when there are many other professionals who work just as hard but do not receive nearly as much compensation.
Moreover, there are countless individuals who face extreme poverty and hardship, and it is difficult to justify why sports stars should earn millions of dollars for their work while so many others struggle to make ends meet. It also creates a disparity between athletes and fans, as many people cannot afford to attend sporting events or purchase branded merchandise due to the high prices associated with them.
However, it is important to acknowledge that sports stars often have a limited amount of time to earn money due to the physical demands of their careers. Additionally, they are often subjected to high levels of pressure and scrutiny, which can take a significant toll on their mental health and well-being. Therefore, it is reasonable for them to expect to earn a comfortable living during their limited time in the spotlight.
In conclusion, while I believe that it is unfair for sports stars to earn such exorbitant amounts of money, I also acknowledge that there are valid arguments on both sides of the debate. Ultimately, it is up to individuals and society as a whole to determine the appropriate level of compensation for sports stars, while also working to address the broader social and economic issues that contribute to inequality and poverty.
1. Question: Some people believe that sports stars earn too much money, while others think that they deserve the amount they are paid. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Answer: In recent years, the salaries of professional athletes have skyrocketed, leading to much debate about whether they are overpaid or deserve the high salaries they earn. This essay will examine both sides of the argument before offering an opinion.
On the one hand, it can be argued that sports stars earn too much money. Many people believe that athletes are given unjustifiably high salaries for simply playing a game. They argue that this money could be better spent on more important causes, such as healthcare and education. Additionally, the vast sums of money paid to professional athletes can create a culture of greed and entitlement, which is not beneficial for society as a whole.
On the other hand, others believe that sports stars deserve the amount they are paid. Professional athletes work incredibly hard to reach the highest level of their sport and often have a limited earning window due to the physical demands of their profession. The fame and fortune that comes with being a professional athlete is often the result of years of hard work and dedication to their sport, and they should be rewarded accordingly. Furthermore, professional athletes are often also required to engage in public relations work and sponsorships, meaning that they bring significant value to their teams and the wider community.
In my opinion, while it is true that some athletes may be overpaid, most professional athletes work hard and deserve the salaries they receive. In addition to their physical abilities, athletes often have to navigate a highly competitive industry and must be able to perform under pressure. The value that they bring to their teams and to society as a whole cannot be understated.
In conclusion, while there are valid arguments on both sides of the debate, I believe that professional athletes deserve the high salaries they earn. The work and dedication that goes into being a professional athlete cannot be underestimated, and their contributions to society and the sports industry cannot be denied.
2. Question: Some people think that governments should invest in sports facilities in order to improve public health. Others think that there are better ways to improve public health. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Sample answer: It is true that public health is a major concern for governments around the world. While some people believe that investing in sports facilities is the best way to improve public health, others argue that there are more effective ways to achieve this goal. In this essay, I will discuss both views and provide my own opinion.
On the one hand, those who advocate for investing in sports facilities argue that physical activity is essential to maintaining good health. They believe that by building more sports facilities, such as gyms, swimming pools, and soccer fields, governments can encourage people to exercise more often. In addition, these facilities can also provide people with a social environment where they can meet and interact with others who share similar interests. This can help to promote a sense of community and belonging, which can have positive effects on mental health.
On the other hand, some people argue that there are better ways to improve public health than building sports facilities. For example, they suggest that governments could invest in public transportation systems or build more sidewalks and bike lanes to encourage people to walk or bike to work. In addition, they argue that providing people with access to healthy food options and education on nutrition can be just as effective at improving public health as building sports facilities.
In my opinion, both approaches have their merits, and a combination of both strategies may be the most effective way to improve public health. While sports facilities can provide people with an opportunity to exercise and socialize, they may not be accessible or appealing to everyone. Therefore, it is important to also invest in other initiatives that can make it easier for people to be physically active, such as building more bike lanes or providing education on nutrition.
In conclusion, while there are different approaches to improving public health, investing in sports facilities can be an effective way to encourage physical activity and promote social interaction. However, governments should also consider investing in other initiatives that can make it easier for people to adopt healthy behaviors, such as active transportation and healthy food options.
3. Topic: Some people believe that professional sportsmen and women are paid too much money. Do you agree or disagree? Give reasons and relevant examples to support your opinion.
Essay:
There has been a lot of debate about the amount of money that professional sportsmen and women are paid. Some people believe that they earn far too much money, while others argue that their high salaries are justified. In my opinion, I believe that professional athletes are paid too much money and there are several reasons for this.
Firstly, the amount of money that professional athletes earn is disproportionate to the value they bring to society. Although sports provide entertainment and bring people together, they do not contribute to the betterment of society in the same way that doctors, teachers, or engineers do. These professionals are often paid far less than athletes, despite the fact that their work is essential to the functioning of society. Therefore, it is unfair that athletes receive such high salaries for doing something that is not as necessary as other professions.
Secondly, the vast sums of money paid to professional athletes are often at the expense of smaller sports programs and amateur athletes. Many sports programs in schools and universities struggle to find funding and resources, despite the fact that they contribute to the development of young people and the wider community. This is because the majority of sports funding is directed towards professional leagues and athletes. As a result, many talented athletes do not have the opportunity to develop their skills and achieve their full potential.
Finally, the excessive salaries of professional athletes can have a negative impact on society by promoting materialism and consumerism. When young people see their sporting heroes earning millions of dollars, they may begin to believe that success and happiness are only attainable through wealth and fame. This can lead to a culture of greed and selfishness, rather than one of community and cooperation.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that professional sportsmen and women are paid too much money. Their high salaries are disproportionate to the value they bring to society, and the money they receive often comes at the expense of smaller sports programs and amateur athletes. Furthermore, the excessive salaries of professional athletes can have a negative impact on society by promoting materialism and consumerism. It is time to reevaluate our priorities and ensure that we are supporting the people and programs that truly matter.
SPORTS
4. Essay Question: Some people think that sports should be a compulsory part of the school curriculum, while others believe that it should be optional. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Sample Answer:
Sports have been an integral part of human civilization for centuries, and many people believe that they should be an essential part of the school curriculum. While some people argue that sports should be compulsory for all students, others believe that it should be an optional activity. In this essay, we will discuss both sides of the argument and present our own opinion on the matter.
On the one hand, advocates of compulsory sports argue that physical education is just as important as academic education, and should be a mandatory part of the curriculum. They argue that playing sports helps develop a range of skills such as teamwork, discipline, leadership, and time management, all of which are important for success in life. In addition, sports can promote a healthy lifestyle and help combat obesity, which is becoming a major public health issue in many countries.
On the other hand, opponents of compulsory sports argue that not all students are interested in sports, and that it is unfair to force them to participate in something they don't enjoy. They believe that students should have the freedom to choose their own extracurricular activities based on their interests and talents, and that compulsory sports could be detrimental to the physical and mental well-being of some students.
In our opinion, while it is important to encourage physical activity among students, sports should not be compulsory. Instead, schools should provide a variety of extracurricular activities that cater to a range of interests and abilities. This could include activities such as music, art, drama, and community service, in addition to sports. Students should be encouraged to participate in activities that they enjoy and are passionate about, as this can help foster a sense of purpose and belonging, and promote overall well-being.
In conclusion, while there are valid arguments on both sides of the debate, we believe that sports should not be a compulsory part of the school curriculum. Instead, schools should provide a range of extracurricular activities that cater to a range of interests and abilities, and encourage students to pursue activities that they enjoy and are passionate about.
5. Question: Some people argue that sports have become too commercialized. Do you agree or disagree?
Answer: There is no denying that sports have become increasingly commercialized over the years, with the rise of big money sponsorships, lucrative television deals, and the ever-growing influence of sports brands. While some argue that this trend is inevitable and ultimately beneficial to athletes and the industry as a whole, others worry that it has gone too far and that the pursuit of profit has overshadowed the true spirit of sports.
Personally, I tend to agree with the latter view. While I understand that money is an important part of the sports business, I believe that the excessive focus on commercialization has had several negative consequences. For one thing, it has led to a widening gap between the elite, professional athletes who reap the rewards of sponsorship deals and those who play purely for the love of the game. This has also led to a homogenization of sports, where teams and players are increasingly indistinguishable due to the branding that they carry.
Furthermore, the commercialization of sports has led to the prioritization of certain events over others, with only the most high-profile games and tournaments receiving significant coverage and attention. This has diminished the value of smaller, grassroots events and has also contributed to the erosion of local and regional identities in sports.
In conclusion, while I understand the commercial realities of the sports industry, I believe that there needs to be a better balance between profit and the true spirit of sports. This will require a concerted effort from all stakeholders, including athletes, sponsors, and fans, to ensure that the values and traditions of sports are not lost in the pursuit of profit.
6. Question: Some people think that sports stars earn too much money. What is your opinion?
Answer: In my view, it is true that some sports stars earn exorbitant amounts of money. While I understand that their fame and skills are in high demand, it seems unfair that they should receive such astronomical salaries when there are many other professionals who work just as hard but do not receive nearly as much compensation.
Moreover, there are countless individuals who face extreme poverty and hardship, and it is difficult to justify why sports stars should earn millions of dollars for their work while so many others struggle to make ends meet. It also creates a disparity between athletes and fans, as many people cannot afford to attend sporting events or purchase branded merchandise due to the high prices associated with them.
However, it is important to acknowledge that sports stars often have a limited amount of time to earn money due to the physical demands of their careers. Additionally, they are often subjected to high levels of pressure and scrutiny, which can take a significant toll on their mental health and well-being. Therefore, it is reasonable for them to expect to earn a comfortable living during their limited time in the spotlight.
In conclusion, while I believe that it is unfair for sports stars to earn such exorbitant amounts of money, I also acknowledge that there are valid arguments on both sides of the debate. Ultimately, it is up to individuals and society as a whole to determine the appropriate level of compensation for sports stars, while also working to address the broader social and economic issues that contribute to inequality and poverty.
7. Question: Some people believe that sports stars earn too much money, while others think that they deserve the amount they are paid. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Answer: In recent years, the salaries of professional athletes have skyrocketed, leading to much debate about whether they are overpaid or deserve the high salaries they earn. This essay will examine both sides of the argument before offering an opinion.
On the one hand, it can be argued that sports stars earn too much money. Many people believe that athletes are given unjustifiably high salaries for simply playing a game. They argue that this money could be better spent on more important causes, such as healthcare and education. Additionally, the vast sums of money paid to professional athletes can create a culture of greed and entitlement, which is not beneficial for society as a whole.
On the other hand, others believe that sports stars deserve the amount they are paid. Professional athletes work incredibly hard to reach the highest level of their sport and often have a limited earning window due to the physical demands of their profession. The fame and fortune that comes with being a professional athlete is often the result of years of hard work and dedication to their sport, and they should be rewarded accordingly. Furthermore, professional athletes are often also required to engage in public relations work and sponsorships, meaning that they bring significant value to their teams and the wider community.
In my opinion, while it is true that some athletes may be overpaid, most professional athletes work hard and deserve the salaries they receive. In addition to their physical abilities, athletes often have to navigate a highly competitive industry and must be able to perform under pressure. The value that they bring to their teams and to society as a whole cannot be understated.
In conclusion, while there are valid arguments on both sides of the debate, I believe that professional athletes deserve the high salaries they earn. The work and dedication that goes into being a professional athlete cannot be underestimated, and their contributions to society and the sports industry cannot be denied.
8. Question: Some people think that governments should invest in sports facilities in order to improve public health. Others think that there are better ways to improve public health. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Sample answer: It is true that public health is a major concern for governments around the world. While some people believe that investing in sports facilities is the best way to improve public health, others argue that there are more effective ways to achieve this goal. In this essay, I will discuss both views and provide my own opinion.
On the one hand, those who advocate for investing in sports facilities argue that physical activity is essential to maintaining good health. They believe that by building more sports facilities, such as gyms, swimming pools, and soccer fields, governments can encourage people to exercise more often. In addition, these facilities can also provide people with a social environment where they can meet and interact with others who share similar interests. This can help to promote a sense of community and belonging, which can have positive effects on mental health.
On the other hand, some people argue that there are better ways to improve public health than building sports facilities. For example, they suggest that governments could invest in public transportation systems or build more sidewalks and bike lanes to encourage people to walk or bike to work. In addition, they argue that providing people with access to healthy food options and education on nutrition can be just as effective at improving public health as building sports facilities.
In my opinion, both approaches have their merits, and a combination of both strategies may be the most effective way to improve public health. While sports facilities can provide people with an opportunity to exercise and socialize, they may not be accessible or appealing to everyone. Therefore, it is important to also invest in other initiatives that can make it easier for people to be physically active, such as building more bike lanes or providing education on nutrition.
In conclusion, while there are different approaches to improving public health, investing in sports facilities can be an effective way to encourage physical activity and promote social interaction. However, governments should also consider investing in other initiatives that can make it easier for people to adopt healthy behaviors, such as active transportation and healthy food options.