Cambridge IELTS Academic 20 Reading Test 3 Answers with Explanation / IELTS Academic Reading: Cambridge 20 Test 3 Answer / Cambridge IELTS 20 Reading Test 3 Answers with Explanation
- Fakhruddin Babar

- 3 hours ago
- 7 min read
Cambridge 20 IELTS Reading Test -3
Reading Passage 1: Frozen Food
Q | Answer | Keywords | Location | Analytical Explanation |
1 | potatoes | conserved nutritional value, 2000 years ago, freezing then drying | Passage 1, Paragraph 1, lines 3–6 | The text explains that 2,000 years ago, Andean inhabitants froze and then dried "potatoes" in the sun, which "preserved their nutritional value" (conserved). |
2 | butter | 1851, kept cool, adapted trains | Passage 1, Paragraph 2, lines 4–6 | The passage states that in 1851, railroads put blocks of ice in insulated rail cars (adapted trains) to transport "butter" from New York to Boston. |
3 | meat | Two kinds of, shipped to England | Passage 1, Paragraph 4, lines 2–4 | Australian cattlemen realized they could "export meat across the oceans," sending a shipment of "beef and mutton" (which represent two kinds of meat) to England in 1880. |
4 | crystals | quick-freezing methods, did not spoil | Passage 1, Paragraph 7, lines 1–3 | Birdseye developed quick-freezing techniques that "reduced the damage that crystals caused" (Paragraph 4 explains that these crystals previously burst cells and spoilt the flavor). |
5 | cellophane | packaging products, product was visible | Passage 1, Paragraph 7, lines 4–6 | The prompt asks for the material used to keep the product visible. Birdseye introduced "cellophane, the first transparent material... which allowed consumers to see the quality." |
6 | tin | popular, shortage of | Passage 1, Paragraph 9, lines 1–3 | The passage explains that frozen food boomed in the 1940s because canned foods were rationed "to save tin for the war effort." Rationing implies a shortage of this material. |
7 | refrigerator | 1950s, large number of homes had a | Passage 1, Paragraph 9, lines 4–6 | By the 1950s, the technology became affordable, and specifically by 1953, "33 million US families [a large number of homes] owned a refrigerator." |
8 | NOT GIVEN | ice transportation, made Boston ship owners very wealthy | Passage 1, Paragraph 2, lines 2–4 | The text mentions that Boston ship owners "had enormous blocks of Arctic ice towed all over the Atlantic," but it never comments on their financial status or whether this made them "very wealthy." |
9 | TRUE | disadvantage, freezing process, affected the taste | Passage 1, Paragraph 4, lines 5–7 | The text confirms this negative effect, explaining that when crystals expanded and burst cells, it "spoilt the flavor and texture of the food" (flavor = taste). |
10 | FALSE | travelled to Labrador, in order to learn, Inuit froze fish | Passage 1, Paragraph 5, lines 2–4 | The text states Birdseye "went to Labrador in Canada to trap and trade furs." While he was there, he happened to become fascinated by the Inuit freezing fish, but that was not his initial purpose for traveling. |
11 | TRUE | Swanson Foods invested, great deal of money, promotion | Passage 1, Paragraph 10, lines 4–5 | The passage confirms this by stating Swanson launched the TV Dinner "with the help of a clever name and a huge advertising budget" (invested a great deal of money in promotion). |
12 | FALSE | Swanson Foods developed, new style of container | Passage 1, Paragraph 10, lines 6–7 | The text contradicts this by stating the TV Dinner was "served in the same segmented aluminum tray that was used by airlines," meaning they reused an existing design, rather than developing a new one. |
13 | NOT GIVEN | US frozen food industry, currently the largest | Passage 1, Paragraph 11 | The text provides extensive financial figures about the US frozen food industry today ($67 billion annually), but it never compares it to other countries to definitively claim it is the "largest in the world." |
Reading Passage 2: Can the planet’s coral reefs be saved?
Q | Answer | Keywords | Location | Analytical Explanation |
14 | v | Section A | Passage 2, Section A, Paragraph 2 | Paul Pearce-Kelly outlines two distinct goals for the exhibit: 1) "we want to show people how wonderful they are" and 2) "we also want to highlight the research and conservation efforts" (Two clear educational goals). |
15 | ii | Section B | Passage 2, Section B, lines 3–6 | The paragraph describes how algae provide nutrients and coral provides protection. The writer explicitly calls this a "comfortable symbiotic relationship," aligning with the heading "Cooperation beneath the waves." |
16 | iv | Section C | Passage 2, Section C, lines 1–4 | The section highlights how the phrase 'rainforests of the sea' is "dismissed by some naturalists, including David Attenborough." This represents a clear disagreement about the accuracy of a certain phrase. |
17 | vii | Section D | Passage 2, Section D, lines 4–8 | The section lists ongoing menaces and issues a stark warning: "scientists advise that more than 90% of reefs could be lost by 2050 unless urgent action is taken" (A warning of further trouble ahead). |
18 | iii | Section E | Passage 2, Section E, lines 1–8 | This paragraph details actions scientists are taking to mitigate damage: pinpointing hardy corals, increasing breeding rates, and spawning artificially to "help in restoring blighted reefs" (Working to lessen the problems). |
19 | vi | Section F | Passage 2, Section F, lines 5–8 | The text focuses on the psychological aim of the displays: to "encourage them to believe that we can do something to save the planet's reefs," which perfectly matches the goal of "Promoting hope." |
20/21 | C, E | TWO, causes of damage | Passage 2, Section D, lines 4–6 | The text explicitly lists multiple threats. "Pollution by humans" matches C (contamination from waste), and "ocean current changes" matches E (alterations in the usual flow of water). A, B, and D are not listed. |
22/23 | B, D | TWO, true of researchers at London Zoo | Passage 2, Section E, lines 4–8 | Researchers aim to find species that "can survive best in warm, acidic waters," matching B (identify corals that can cope well). They also aim to "try to increase coral breeding rates," matching D (speed up reproduction). |
24 | tentacles | Corals have a number of, collect their food | Passage 2, Section B, lines 1–2 | The text explains that corals consist of polyps "with tentacles for capturing small marine creatures" (capturing = collect their food). |
25 | protection | Algae gain, inside the coral | Passage 2, Section B, lines 3–4 | The text notes that the algae living within the polyps "in turn get protection." |
26 | colour | Increases in the warmth, remove | Passage 2, Section D, lines 2–3 | The passage explains that "Rising ocean temperatures [increases in warmth] are triggering bleaching events that strip reefs of their colour" (strip = remove). |
Reading Passage 3: Robots and us
Q | Answer | Keywords | Location | Analytical Explanation |
27 | A | Martin Rees, humans will need to restrict, abilities | Passage 3, Paragraph 7, lines 6–8 | Rees states: "we should ensure that robots remain as no more than 'idiot savants' lacking the capacity to outwit us..." Ensuring they lack capacity means artificially restricting their abilities for our safety. |
28 | C | Kathleen Richardson, risk of robots harming us, less serious | Passage 3, Paragraph 9, lines 3–5 | Richardson notes that "as robots have never shown themselves to be a threat to humans, it seems unlikely that they ever will." She implies human fear exaggerates the actual risk, making it less serious than believed. |
29 | B | Daniel Wolpert, many decades, as imaginative | Passage 3, Paragraph 5, lines 5–7 | Wolpert argues: "Expecting a machine close to the creative intelligence [imaginative] of a human within the next 50 years [many decades] would be highly ambitious." |
30 | A | Martin Rees, start considering, treating robots fairly | Passage 3, Paragraph 4, lines 6–8 | Rees ponders the future moral questions: "Should we feel guilty about exploiting [sophisticated robots]? Should we fret if they are underemployed, frustrated, or bored?" This is the essence of considering fair treatment. |
31 | B | Daniel Wolpert, more help to us on Earth than in space | Passage 3, Paragraph 2, lines 4–6 | Wolpert explicitly states: "Using robots to gather resources nearer to home [on Earth] would seem to be a better use of our robotic tools" than sending them to colonise other planets. |
32 | A | Martin Rees, high-quality science fiction, accurate | Passage 3, Paragraph 10, lines 2–4 | Rees advises students to read "first-rate science fiction" instead of "second-rate science," concluding it is "perhaps no more likely to be wrong" (meaning the high-quality fiction may be just as accurate). |
33 | C | Kathleen Richardson, look forward to robots developing greater intelligence | Passage 3, Paragraph 9, lines 5–6 | Richardson notes that fear is not universal: "Not all fear [robots]; many people welcome machine intelligence" (meaning they look forward to its development). |
34 | C | Richardson and Rees, similar views, ethical aspect | Passage 3, Paragraphs 1 & 3 | Rees argues colonised planets should be "preserved" rather than modified ("terraforming"). Richardson thinks "colonisation" is morally dubious and we shouldn't "impose a particular model." Both argue ethically against making major changes to other planets for our benefit. |
35 | B | Rees and Wolpert, share an opinion, extent of | Passage 3, Paragraphs 4 & 5 | Rees points out robots can beat humans at chess but lack sensory awareness. Wolpert notes machines can navigate better but lack visual/speech reliability. Both are outlining the exact limits (extent) of the advances made in machine intelligence so far. |
36 | D | Wolpert disagrees with Richardson, question of | Passage 3, Paragraphs 8 & 9 | Wolpert argues "we have already seen the damaging effects... in the form of computer viruses" (harm already done). Richardson argues "none have in fact risen up and challenged human supremacy." They directly disagree on whether AI has already caused harm. |
37 | B | Richardson, fear of machines | Passage 3, Paragraph 6, lines 3–5 | Richardson believes the fear stems from "humans' tendency to personify inanimate objects: we create machines based on representations of ourselves." This perfectly matches attributing human characteristics to non-human entities. |
38 | C | Rees, cause for concern | Passage 3, Paragraph 7, lines 3–5 | Rees worries that computer networks "could behave like a single 'brain' with a mind of its own, and with goals that may be contrary to human welfare." This describes AI developing independent thought. |
39 | B | Wolpert emphasise, science fiction | Passage 3, Paragraph 11, lines 4–5 | Wolpert notes: "Interestingly, almost no science fiction envisages a future without robots." This emphasizes how essential and fundamental robots are to the very existence of the sci-fi genre. |
40 | C | Richardson doing, comment about reality and fantasy | Passage 3, Paragraph 12, lines 7–10 |


Comments